Student loan government lackeys
Years ago I read
a NME interview with Keith Moon. The journalist arrived as an
accountant departed. Moon lobbed a flowerpot at the accountant's
head. There's honest performance appraisal and feedback. “Get us
paid in dollars. Sterling 'aint worth a rub.”
Here's some
honest feedback to the civil service, generally: you 'aint worth a
rub. Cut your pay by 90% and you'd still be bad value. How someone
you've messed about, with days to live, hasn't gunned you all down or
blown you all up heaven knows. I may start one of those training
camps for terminally ill and terminally messed about people who want
to suicide bomb HMRC offices. Osama Bin Liner. Disguised as cleaners.
You'd have to plant the bombs in the restrooms / fag shelters /
meeting rooms. Forget the phone answering desks. They're deserted
24/7.
Armstrong v Saville
The headline is 'can Jimmy Saville and
Lance Armstrong charities survive?' Underneath that the article
describes them both as disgraced.
No sensible, intelligent, human can
consider the two under the same umbrella, under the same headline, in
the same article. Step back. Analyse. Think.
Lance Armstrong survived cancer to win
the most brutal, the most incomprehensibly difficult bike race seven
times. He was injecting godknowswhat into himself. Frequently. In
large doses. So were his opponents. In considering Armstrong,
whatever your stance on doping, look at the race. A series of days
riding a bike over huge distances, with massive climbs and descents
along the way. Almost thirty days of this. For variety, time trials,
nowhere to hide. Team time trials, with the last man home counting,
nowhere to hide. A man talented, dedicated, strong enough to overcome
the cancer, and yes, chemically enhanced enough to win the most
brutal race in cycling. Seven times.
You don't ever win the Tour de France,
that's the winner's mantra. You just don't lose touch long enough to
compete on the final day. There's a truck, named in Frech as the 'mop
up truck' or something similar, that picks up each day's
non-survivors. Throws them in with their bikes. Too far off the pace
or too damaged to be of any use from that point onwards. A properly
brutal end to a brutal test.
Saville. What was his talent, exactly?
Act brilliantly? Play an instrument? Write like an angel? What,
exactly?
The cult of the celebrity. Why
self-promoters like Moyles should be shot at dawn. What can they do?
Paint? Draw? Take magnificent photos? Anything at all? Nope. Nothing
whatsoever.
We have two sets of human parasites.
These career celebs are one of them.
There's an insurmountable difference.
Armstrong (by his own free will) injected himself; Saville injected
those who couldn't resist, with himself.
One is a man (and lives). The other,
well...
Another headline: Strictly beats X
Factor in TV battle
First: don't assume. Your paper may
distribute to retard TV suckers. I don't actually know what
'Strictly' refers to, having made a point of avoiding such wastes of
time. A turd is a turd. A radioactive, toxic, splattered everywhere
turd is just that. Please, at the very least, explain what the
subject is. Any male referring to that show as just “Strictly”
should be removed from the gene pool. By repeated hitting about the
head with a heavy blunt object. I'll gladly volunteer. Can I shout
“strictly what, you ----” down their ears between blows?
Second: there's 20.5 million view those
shows. No wonder telly's aimed at retards.
Third: there's no third. There's your
telly. Have it. Make sure you drop your children on their heads.
Repeatedly. Just in case they may want something more, and be saddled
with your genes, and so have to put up with the stuff beamed into
your living room. Designed for adult-size nappy wearers by adult-size
nappy wearers. Imagine if Cleese, Idle and Palin approached the Beeb
today? “Very good, thanks guys, but we've got karaoke hairdressers
from Essex, ice-skating division four footballers, and a tribute to a
sex offender disc jockey to fit in. Sorry. Bye.”
No comments:
Post a Comment