The streets of London
are paved with gold
Well, if not actual gold, other stuff that’s more expensive,
pound for pound. After sweeping the streets and extracting the more obvious
recycling materials to the point where only dust is left, they go to work on
that dust, recovering platinum, palladium, and rhodium, which have hi-tech
uses, as well as a little gold.
The spokesman for the cleaning company was refreshingly
straightforward in a scientific community that has increasingly obfuscated
matters behind their over-complication: do you want to die out on a scorched
planet (carbon fuel); do you want to die of radiation poisoning (nuclear
power); or can you, perhaps, Mr and Mrs NIMBY bird-spotting retard, put up with
those wind turbines that represent a threat only to the occasional passing
seagull and your view of the hills? Them’re the options, whatever the
professors of this and that, particularly those paid by the government or energy
companies say.
Cleaning bloke said that either everything goes to landfill,
as before, or it gets recycled, which is much better all round. In what sounds
like a belated admission that the Dusseldorf model is the way to go, everything
is collected, recycled, recycled for a lesser use, burnt for energy, that
energy is used to fuel the processes attacking the leftover dust, as are some
acids and other chemicals recovered from the dustcarts, to recover the
remaining rare and expensive metals in that dust.
League tables for eleven year olds
I don’t see what the fuss is about. Nope, a 45 minute test
isn’t exact, but few things are exact. If your guide to what’s worthwhile is
what’s exact, then stop teaching the humanities and focus entirely on maths and
the sciences, and certainly abandon religious education.
The do-gooders were in full glass half empty voice:
The bottom 10% will get an inferiority complex.
Do-gooders: some deserve an inferiority complex. It might
inspire the best of that 10% to do something to move up the percentiles.
The bottom 10% will abandon academic studies.
Do-gooders: not all the top 10% will be academic by nature
or inclination. Why does living in the physical world rule out being
intelligent? Or is it because do-gooders tend to be physical dyslexics? Note
their inability to tolerate one person running faster than another or being
better equipped to earn a fortune at sport than a nine-stone weakling (ahh,
bless).
The bottom 10%...etc., ad infinitum…
Do-gooders: don’t the top groups get a boost? Sit the exam.
Take the results on the chin. Stop the whingeing. Same for everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment