Your tax, your responsibility
Set up to fail. That's what we are.
Despite the world's most complex tax system, we're responsible for
ensuring we pay the right amount of tax to the thieves at HMRC.
Taking that apart a bit:
Ours isn't among the most
complicated, or more complicated than most, or more complicated than
it needs to be, it's the most complicated in the world. Number
one. Top of the pops. The bottom line we're working to (that's us,
you and me, not HMRC's responsibility, oh no) is equivalent to
several times the complete works of Shakespeare in length. I can't
see how it's reasonable to expect the population to take
responsibility for their taxes when doing so would take all their
time, so they can't earn any money and so that the whole exercise
becomes irrelevant. Several times the complete works. All about tax
rules. That's dry and dreary enough to make you want to escape to
warmer places with lower costs of living and a more sensible,
straightforward approach.
We're responsible. Not HMRC.
They have offices, staff, and, no doubt, some pretty extravagantly
paid (extravagantly overpaid? I think so) civil servants supposedly
heading the whole thing up. They've got the data handling capacity,
the software, everything at their fingertips, but still want to treat
the population as their unpaid skivvies, doing their donkey work for
them, at their beck and call. Not the employers, their payroll, their
HR departments, their resources, their software.
Say we're taxed at 25% of income. That
income tax thing. Then say we're taxed at 20% VAT on everything.
That's generous, I think, because although some things are
zero-rated, some things, like petrol, booze, fags, etc, attract
outrageous and punitive levels of taxation. Tack on a bit of NI and
we're stopped around 48% of what we earn. The thieves at HMRC are
stealing (at a conservative estimate) almost half of our hard-earned,
and somehow, if anyone, our employers or HMRC makes a mistake, it's
down to us.
One last question:
The prime minister, the chancellor, and
the taxman are drowning.
You can save only one of them.
Would you carry on with the crossword
or head off for some lunch?
Goodbye to a free press
There's a long rant here. One I need to
avoid. Some short points:
Lawrence Wright has written a detailed,
researched, expose of Scientology. Published in America. Accurate and
properly underpinned. The Scientologists would make UK publication
too expensive to defend in our courts.
It's all about phone hacking. A crime
our anti-crime forces failed to deal with. It affected a small
minority of the rich and famous and loud. They've driven knee-jerk
responses.
News, apparently, is what someone,
somewhere, wants to suppress. The rest is advertising. That figures.
Goodbye Private Eye.
Thank god for the Internet, hello a
world of guerilla online publications tugging the tiger's tail.
Hugh Grant? You're a selfish, spoilt,
odious little man. Pity they hacked your phone, and not your body.
No-one's emerged with a scrap of
dignity. None of the major political parties. None of the pressure
groups. Not the popular press. Not the phone-hacked blubbering
celebs.
Anyone who genuinely wants
investigative, critical, risk-taking journalism to live on will be
dismayed.
The Leveson Report has been described
as 'tedious' and 'unreadable'. A tedious and unreadable report on
journalism?
No comments:
Post a Comment