The placebo effect
97% of doctors
have used placebo treatments for certain patients. There are,
apparently, true placebo treatments. Pills that consist of nothing
but coated sugar, that sort of thing. Tonics that are nothing but
coloured water or cold tea. There are also, apparently, secondary
placebos. They include unnecessary blood tests followed by an 'all
clear' message that the doctor knew was coming before the lab results
arrived. An examination and a 'everything in order' where it isn't
really called for, to reassure a worried patient.
According to the
doctors' representative, the shock isn't the 97%, but that as many as
3% have not used a placebo.
Doesn't that,
however, suggest that 97% of doctors have, at some time, deceived
their patients? Led them, for their own good, but still led them up
the garden path?
Doesn't that
also suggest that it works? Were that not the case, and with so many
using them, wouldn't there have been a patients' rebellion by now.
Some sort of outcry, at least.
Can I invent a
syndrome here, and also invent a niche product?
Place-know
(pla-see-no) syndrome: this is where the person knows full well that
they're taking a sugar pill or spoonfuls of coloured water, but
notice an improvement in their condition or symptoms in any case.
Where, despite knowing they've been administered a placebo, they're
cured.
The niche
product may one day sit beside the aspirin, paracetamol, cough
medicine and other off the shelf remedies on the chemist and
supermarket shelves. Simply known as Placebo (TM) pills or potions,
these inert and medically neutral substances would be available
directly to the public, at a fraction of the cost of a NHS
prescription. All we need is some fancy packaging and production can
begin.
The (even more) essential Miles
Davis
I've been
listening to this a lot. It has trumped my Essential Miles Davis
double cd. It's four cds. Maybe it should be called more of the
essential Miles Davis.
There's been a budget
That used to mean something. Radios
were tuned into the speech and the commentary. Whether or not it
mattered, there was a little bit of sitting up and taking notice.
Even if it was only lip service to join in the conversation. That
does not seem to be the case any more. Outside the more politicised
broadcasters, there's little media or public interest I've come
across.
Serious foul play
Typical Football Association, and
typical officiating. A potentially career-ending challenge, the
player goes unpunished and a protesting assistant manager is sent off
to the stands. Swearing and handbags, having an opinion equates to
bringing the game into disrepute, unless it agrees with the FA's
opinion, they're all swiftly dealt with in draconian fashion.
However, the FA, the players' union,
the clubs, the referees, uncle Tom Cobblers, all signed up to the
deal at the start of the season. Unless anyone dissented then,
they're on rocky ground squeaking too loudly now.
No comments:
Post a Comment