St Patrick v St George
A couple of people have pointed out
that we, the English, are happy to find Guinness, recipes for
colcannon, Irish stew, and wander around in huge, garish green foam
hats on St Paddies, while St George's passes us by.
I think it's the same with the Jocks.
Burns night and we're reaching for the haggis, tatties and neeps and
a dram. We don't celebrate Shakespeare day / night / evening, do we?
North of the border they also get an additional new years bank
holiday. Sensible.
I don't know (or care) who the patron
saint of Poland is, or even if we have one (we probably do). If I had
to adopt one, it wouldn't be St George (get to work and tug those
forelocks, bow, curtsey, and throw yourselves to the ground in front
of your royals and aristocracy, you plebs). It'd be St Pat (take a
day off, bejesus, and enjoy the crac).
I wasn't on the phone officer...
...I was looking something up on the
Internet.
A Surrey Police press release records
some great excuses from drivers nabbed on their phones.
One said: “it's the ex-wife. She's
having a right rant. Would you mind talking to her?”
Apparently there was a “I wasn't on
the phone, I was reading a text” and a “I was answering an
email.”
There were over zealous bosses checking
whereabouts and all sorts of things to blame.
I hope someone cited roadworks,
congestion, and rubbish, slow-moving traffic. Doing the speed limit,
there's no temptation to use the phone. It sits there, unwanted and
ignored. When I join the M25 (speed limit 70 mph) from the A-road I
use to get to the M25 (speed limit 70 mph, average speed typically 70
mph) and slow down to between 5 mph and 10 mph for a few miles (pre
roadworks) and now between 0 mph and 3 mph (roadworks), well, come
here phone, lets make some calls, and see who's emailed chasing for
what.
The guy using the Internet was probably
looking for an alternative route that would allow him to make decent,
reasonable progress. Expecting drivers to abide by the law is a very
one-sided bargain when the roads don't come up to scratch and meet
their obligations. Last Monday, apparently (I know there was snow, if
you can't drive in snow don't drive in it, don't block the road, and
why don't the council have bulldozers to clear the stuck vehicles
away so the roads remain passable?), it was taking the poor people
who had to go that way almost two hours to progress the distance of
less than a mile along the High Street. Many of them would've been
there, at between nine and ten o'clock, because they'd had a long,
slow, arduous drive back home, stuck in jams caused by the lack of
preparation and will to keep things moving (lack of will: see “miles
of tailbacks due to ongoing accident investigation”), and then had
'almost home' become 'stuck still for hours' at the final stretch.
We enter into a contract for the roads,
in good faith. There's offer: “buy a car, pay road and excessive
fuel tax, and you can use it”. There's acceptance: buy car, pay
taxes, and there's consideration (contractually) when the money
changes hands. Then there's a contract frustrated out of existence by
the other parties lack of performance of their obligations. One third
of drivers have had to have their cars fixed due to pothole damage.
One third.
Do your bit, first, then expect better
behaviour. Maybe.
No comments:
Post a Comment