A lawless
brat from a council flat, oh, oh
A bit of
context:
I don’t
think too deeply about 99% of the rubbish I blurt out.
I’ve thought
deeply about thinking deeply, and on reflection, decided that blurting is the
best option. Through blurting comes catharsis. Blurting is like that “best
don’t bottle it up love…” from the carey-sharies, just without their recoil and
“you can’t say THAT!” directly upon de-bottling (de-bottlement? corkage?
outpouring? let's settle on outpouring).
Outpouring
allows that mix of what you really think, what you really think right at that
moment, and what you’re feeling to surface, and that’s as valid and relevant as
anything else you ever communicate, I guess.
I’m not
well-educated. That’s my own fault, I was given every opportunity to be
well-educated, but there were a number of stumbling blocks. I’m a classroom
nightmare. A teacher’s pet, but only if that pets is an unwanted, noisy,
disruptive adolescent that chews the furniture, bites the postie and eats the
homework. Too often my attention depends on the personality and enthusiasm of
whoever’s trying to put things across, rather than the subject matter. On the
subject of subject-matter, my first questions are always: “why do I need to
know this / what’s this for / what’s the point of this? / why are you telling
me this?” rendering the teaching of religious education, history, Latin, and
the like absolute non-starters in the first place. Then there’s the assumed
authority. You may have the suit and tie (in my day it was the cord jacket with
elbow patches) and the tie, and I may be the naughty boy on the back of the
bus, but, with all due respect (and to misquote Rod Stewart) naughty boys on
the back of the bus have more fun.
The back of
the bus is the natural habitat of the genuinely anti-establishment personality.
There’s a
price to pay for being anti-establishment. It starts with detentions, lines,
canings, all of which generally only strengthen the feelings that lead to
authority-issues, which in turn lead to more punishment. How are you supposed
to feel about ‘authority’ when your mother comes out with tripe like “this
hurts me more than it hurts you”? Even as a very young kid, I was thinking “in
that case, how about we swap places and I administer the sound thrashing?” It
goes on. It can cost you jobs, money, opportunities (particularly through
refusing to play along with hierarchical organisations, and refusing to spend
time networking (“She never bothers with
people she hates, That's why the lady is a tramp”). Having paid those dues,
that’s why I rail against pro-establishment and non-rebels who try to play the
anti-establishment card. To a lesser degree, the Chris Moyles, James Cordons of
the world, pulling the wool over housewives’ eyes. To a greater extent people
like Nigel Farage. How genuine an establishment alternative would UKIP appear,
were it better publicised that Farage is an ex-banker, one of the £millions
bonus brigade? That whenever they are under threat they resort to calling the
police or looking to silence their critics in exactly the establishment ways
that they’re supposedly against? That a UKIP councillor had the local cops visit
and threaten someone blogging embarrassing facts that discredited him?
Anyway, I’ve
found my political philosophy at last, and I’m an anarchist. I truly believe
that any state interference, any bunch of monkeys telling me what I should and
shouldn’t do and what I should and shouldn’t think, and how to go about living
the one life I have, just has to be a bad, inhibiting, repressing thing,
whether those monkeys be ‘elected’ politicians or blokes in frocks with silly
hats, or clerics or whatever.
On the false
anti-establishment theme, apparently Farage backed some wanky UKIP mate of his
who came out with some racist shite, saying “he’s just a plain-speaking Essex
lad”. I wonder if he’d think me “just a plain speaking Kent boy” on hearing me
say:
“Farage is a
snivelling little toad, and a euro-MP making him a blood- and money-sucking
parasite resembling the ticks my dogs get, and I would love to see him suffer
the same fate: painless removal, followed by crushing to death and
unceremonious disposal”.
No comments:
Post a Comment